2. cnp3-ebook
3. English
4. Zen

39 ../../protocols/ethernet.rst:176
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — Two multi-mode optical fiber, 2 km maximum 42/10000 · 42
39 ../../protocols/http.rst:159
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — the `Content-Type:` header is the :term:`MIME` header that indicates the type of the attached MIME document. HTML pages use the `text/html` type. 145/10000 · 145
39 ../../protocols/http2.rst:266
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — Footnotes 9/10000 · 9
39 ../../protocols/ipv6.rst:130
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — IPv6 supports unicast, multicast and anycast addresses. An IPv6 unicast address is used to identify one datalink-layer interface on a host. If a host has several datalink layer interfaces (e.g. an Ethernet interface and a WiFi interface), then it needs several IPv6 addresses. In general, an IPv6 unicast address is structured as shown in the figure below. 356/10000 · 356
39 ../../protocols/ethernet.rst:162
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — In the late 1980s, 10 Mbps became too slow for some applications and network manufacturers developed several LAN technologies that offered higher bandwidth, such as the 100 Mbps FDDI LAN that used optical fibers. As the development of 10Base5, 10Base2 and 10BaseT had shown that Ethernet could be adapted to different physical layers, several manufacturers started to work on 100 Mbps Ethernet and convinced IEEE to standardize this new technology that was initially called `Fast Ethernet`. `Fast Ethernet` was designed under two constraints. First, `Fast Ethernet` had to support twisted pairs. Although it was easier from a physical layer perspective to support higher bandwidth on coaxial cables than on twisted pairs, coaxial cables were a nightmare from deployment and maintenance perspectives. Second, `Fast Ethernet` had to be perfectly compatible with the existing 10 Mbps Ethernet to allow `Fast Ethernet` technology to be used initially as a backbone technology to interconnect 10 Mbps Ethernet networks. This forced `Fast Ethernet` to use exactly the same frame format as 10 Mbps Ethernet. This implied that the minimum `Fast Ethernet` frame size remained at 512 bits. To preserve CSMA/CD with this minimum frame size and 100 Mbps instead of 10 Mbps, the duration of the `slot time` was decreased to 5.12 microseconds. 1329/10000 · 1329
39 ../../protocols/routing.rst:132
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — Each router must exchange HELLOs and link state packets with all the other routers on the LAN. This increases the number of OSPF packets that are sent and processed by each router. 180/10000 · 180
39 ../../protocols/rpc.rst:138
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — The `id` field, which is present in the request and the response plays the same role as the identifier field in the DNS message. It allows the caller to match the response with the request that it sent. This `id` is very important when JSON-RPC is used over the connectionless transport service which is unreliable. If a request is sent, it may need to be retransmitted and it is possible that a callee will receive twice the same request (e.g. if the response for the first request was lost). In the DNS, when a request is lost, it can be retransmitted without causing any difficulty. However with remote procedure calls in general, losses can cause some problems. Consider a method which is used to deposit money on a bank account. If the request is lost, it will be retransmitted and the deposit will be eventually performed. However, if the response is lost, the caller will also retransmit its request. This request will be received by the callee that will deposit the money again. To prevent this problem from affecting the application, either the programmer must ensure that the remote procedures that it calls can be safely called multiple times or the application must verify whether the request has been transmitted earlier. In most deployments, the programmers use remote methods that can be safely called multiple times without breaking the application logic. 1371/10000 · 1371
39 ../../protocols/ssh.rst:296
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — For some of the algorithms, it is possible to negotiate the utilization of no algorithm. This happens frequently for the compression algorithm that is not always used. For this, both the client and the server must announce ``null`` in their ordered list of supported algorithms. 278/10000 · 278
39 ../../protocols/tcp.rst:121
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — the `acknowledgment number` set to the `sequence number` of the received `SYN` segment incremented by 1 :math:`\pmod{2^{32}}`. When a TCP entity sends a segment having `x+1` as acknowledgment number, this indicates that it has received all data up to and including sequence number `x` and that it is expecting data having sequence number `x+1`. As the `SYN` flag was set in a segment having sequence number `x`, this implies that setting the `SYN` flag in a segment consumes one sequence number. 495/10000 · 495
39 ../../protocols/tls.rst:167
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — `Extensions` : TLS supports various extensions in the ``ClientHello`` message. These extensions :rfc:`6066` are important to allow the protocol to evolve, but many of them go beyond the scope of this chapter. 208/10000 · 208
39 ../../protocols/wifi.rst:99
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — 802.11 data frame format 24/10000 · 24
39 ../../principles/network.rst:232
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — Networks deployed several techniques to update the forwarding tables upon the arrival of a packet. In this section, we briefly present the principles that underlie three of these techniques. 190/10000 · 190
39 ../../principles/referencemodels.rst:237
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — the `Session layer`. The Session layer contains the protocols and mechanisms that are necessary to organize and to synchronize the dialogue and to manage the data exchange of presentation layer entities. While one of the main functions of the transport layer is to cope with the unreliability of the network layer, the session's layer objective is to hide the possible failures of transport-level connections to the upper layer higher. For this, the Session Layer provides services that allow establishing a session-connection, to support in-order data exchange (including mechanisms that allow recovering from the abrupt release of an underlying transport connection), and to release the connection in an orderly manner. 721/10000 · 721
39 ../../bibliography.rst:56
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — Diffie, W., Hellman, M., `New directions in cryptography`, in Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on , vol.22, no.6, pp.644-654, Nov 1976, https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1976.1055638 184/10000 · 184
39 ../../principles/sharing.rst:238
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — `Tail drop` is the simplest packet discard technique. When a buffer is full, the arriving packet is discarded. `Tail drop` can be easily implemented. This is, by far, the most widely used packet discard mechanism. However, it suffers from two important drawbacks. First, since `tail drop` discards packets only when the buffer is full, buffers tend to be congested and real-time applications may suffer from increased delays. Second, `tail drop` is blind when it discards a packet. It may discard a packet from a low bandwidth interactive flow while most of the buffer is used by large file transfers. 601/10000 · 601
40 ../../exercises/ex-sharing.rst:647
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — the host continues to listen until the communication channel becomes free. It transmits as soon as the communication channel becomes free. 138/10000 · 138
40 ../../exercises/sockets.rst:324
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — Note that we can reuse our ``send_hello_to_peer`` function without any modification as we wrote it to handle any kind of sockets, including sockets using the IPv6 network protocol. 180/10000 · 180
40 ../../exercises/network.rst:365
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — If you compute the routing tables of all routers in this network, you would obtain a table such as the table below : 116/10000 · 116
40 ../../glossary.rst:305
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — file transfer 13/10000 · 13
40 ../../exercises/reliability.rst:78
	English ↹ ↵ NBS … “ ” ‘ ’ ﹙-﹚ ‐ – — Is it possible for a selective-repeat receiver to inter-operate with a go-back-n sender ? Justify your answer. 110/10000 · 110