2. cnp3-ebook
3. exercises/network
4. French
5. Browse

4 / 4

/ 4

All strings

• Untranslated strings • state:empty
• Unfinished strings • state:<translated
• Translated strings • state:>=translated
• Strings marked for edit • state:needs-editing
• Strings with suggestions • has:suggestion
• Strings with variants • has:variant
• Strings with labels • has:label
• Strings with context • has:context
• Unfinished strings without suggestions • state:<translated AND NOT has:suggestion
• Strings with comments • has:comment
• Strings with any failing checks • has:check
• Approved strings • state:approved
• Strings waiting for review • state:translated

Target string

• Position and priority
• Position
• Priority
• Labels
• Source string
• Target string
• String age
• Number of words
• Number of comments
• Number of failing checks
• Key

	English	French
	Routes on E	Routes sur E
	If you compute the routing tables of all routers in this network, you would obtain a table such as the table below :	Si vous calculez les tables de routage de tous les routeurs de ce réseau, vous obtiendrez un tableau tel que le tableau ci-dessous :
	An important difference between OSPF and RIP is that OSPF routers flood link state packets that allow the other routers to recompute their own routing tables while RIP routers exchange distance vectors. Consider that link `B-C` fails and that router `B` is the first to detect the failure. At this point, `B` cannot reach anymore `C`, `D` and `E`. `C` cannot reach `B` and `A` anymore.	Une différence importante entre OSPF et RIP est que les routeurs OSPF envoient des paquets link-state qui permettent aux autres routeurs de recalculer leurs propres tables de routage alors que les routeurs RIP échangent des vecteurs de distance. Imaginons que le lien `B-C` tombe en panne et que le routeur `B` soit le premier à détecter la panne. À ce moment-là, `B` ne peut plus atteindre `C`, `D` et `E`. `C` ne peut plus atteindre `B` et `A`.