Source string Source string

324/10000 · 324
English Actions
Unfortunately, this is not always sufficient to ensure a reliable delivery of the SDUs. Consider the case where a client sends tens of SDUs to a server. If the server is faster than the client, it will be able to receive and process all the frames sent by the client and deliver their content to its user. However, if the server is slower than the client, problems may arise. The datalink entity contains buffers to store SDUs that have been received as a `Data.request` but have not yet been sent. If the application is faster than the physical link, the buffer may become full. At this point, the operating system suspends the application to let the datalink entity empty its transmission queue. The datalink entity also uses a buffer to store the received frames that have not yet been processed by the application. If the application is slow to process the data, this buffer may overflow and the datalink entity will not able to accept any additional frame. The buffers of the datalink entity have a limited size and if they overflow, the arriving frames will be discarded, even if they are correct.
To solve this problem, a reliable protocol must include a feedback mechanism that allows the receiver to inform the sender that it has processed a frame and that another one can be sent. This feedback is required even though there are no transmission errors. To include such a feedback, our reliable protocol must process two types of frames :
data frames carrying a SDU
control frames carrying an acknowledgment indicating that the previous frames was correctly processed
These two types of frames can be distinguished by dividing the frame in two parts :
the `header` that contains one bit set to `0` in data frames and set to `1` in control frames
the payload that contains the SDU supplied by the application
The datalink entity can then be modeled as a finite state machine, containing two states for the receiver and two states for the sender. The figure below provides a graphical representation of this state machine with the sender above and the receiver below.
The above FSM shows that the sender has to wait for an acknowledgment from the receiver before being able to transmit the next SDU. The figure below illustrates the exchange of a few frames between two hosts.
Services and protocols
An important aspect to understand before studying computer networks is the difference between a *service* and a *protocol*. For this, it is useful to start with real world examples. The traditional Post provides a service where a postman delivers letters to recipients. The Post precisely defines which types of letters (size, weight, etc) can be delivered by using the Standard Mail service. Furthermore, the format of the envelope is specified (position of the sender and recipient addresses, position of the stamp). Someone who wants to send a letter must either place the letter at a Post Office or inside one of the dedicated mailboxes. The letter will then be collected and delivered to its final recipient. Note that for the regular service the Post usually does not guarantee the delivery of each particular letter. Some letters may be lost, and some letters are delivered to the wrong mailbox. If a letter is important, then the sender can use the registered service to ensure that the letter will be delivered to its recipient. Some Post services also provide an acknowledged service or an express mail service that is faster than the regular service.
Reliable data transfer on top of an imperfect link
The datalink layer must deal with the transmission errors. In practice, we mainly have to deal with two types of errors in the datalink layer :
Frames can be corrupted by transmission errors
Frames can be lost or unexpected frames can appear
A first glance, loosing frames might seem strange on a single link. However, if we take framing into account, transmission errors can affect the frame delineation mechanism and make the frame unreadable. For the same reason, a receiver could receive two (likely invalid) frames after a sender has transmitted a single frame.
To deal with these types of imperfections, reliable protocols rely on different types of mechanisms. The first problem is transmission errors. Data transmission on a physical link can be affected by the following errors :
random isolated errors where the value of a single bit has been modified due to a transmission error
random burst errors where the values of `n` consecutive bits have been changed due to transmission errors
random bit creations and random bit removals where bits have been added or removed due to transmission errors
The only solution to protect against transmission errors is to add redundancy to the frames that are sent. `Information Theory` defines two mechanisms that can be used to transmit information over a transmission channel affected by random errors. These two mechanisms add redundancy to the transmitted information, to allow the receiver to detect or sometimes even correct transmission errors. A detailed discussion of these mechanisms is outside the scope of this chapter, but it is useful to consider a simple mechanism to understand its operation and its limitations.
`Information theory` defines `coding schemes`. There are different types of coding schemes, but let us focus on coding schemes that operate on binary strings. A coding scheme is a function that maps information encoded as a string of `m` bits into a string of `n` bits. The simplest coding scheme is the (even) parity coding. This coding scheme takes an `m` bits source string and produces an `m+1` bits coded string where the first `m` bits of the coded string are the bits of the source string and the last bit of the coded string is chosen such that the coded string will always contain an even number of bits set to `1`. For example :
`1001` is encoded as `10010`
`1101` is encoded as `11011`
This parity scheme has been used in some RAMs as well as to encode characters sent over a serial line. It is easy to show that this coding scheme allows the receiver to detect a single transmission error, but it cannot correct it. However, if two or more bits are in error, the receiver may not always be able to detect the error.
Some coding schemes allow the receiver to correct some transmission errors. For example, consider the coding scheme that encodes each source bit as follows :
`1` is encoded as `111`
`0` is encoded as `000`
For example, consider a sender that sends `111`. If there is one bit in error, the receiver could receive `011` or `101` or `110`. In these three cases, the receiver will decode the received bit pattern as a `1` since it contains a majority of bits set to `1`. If there are two bits in error, the receiver will not be able anymore to recover from the transmission error.
This simple coding scheme forces the sender to transmit three bits for each source bit. However, it allows the receiver to correct single bit errors. More advanced coding systems that allow recovering from errors are used in several types of physical layers.
Besides framing, datalink layers also include mechanisms to detect and sometimes even recover from transmission errors. To allow a receiver to notice transmission errors, a sender must add some redundant information as an `error detection` code to the frame sent. This `error detection` code is computed by the sender on the frame that it transmits. When the receiver receives a frame with an error detection code, it recomputes it and verifies whether the received `error detection code` matches the computed `error detection code`. If they match, the frame is considered to be valid. Many error detection schemes exist and entire books have been written on the subject. A detailed discussion of these techniques is outside the scope of this book, and we will only discuss some examples to illustrate the key principles.

Loading…

User avatar None

String updated in the repository

cnp3-ebook / principles/reliability — English

A first glance, loosing frames might seem strange on a single link. However, if we take framing into account, transmission errors can affect the frame delineation mechanism and make the frame unreadable. For the same reason, a receiver could receive two (likely invalid) frames after a sender has transmitted a single frame.
A first glance, loosing frames might seem strange on a single link. However, if we take framing into account, transmission errors can affect the frame delineation mechanism and make the frame unreadable. For the same reason, a receiver could receive two (likely invalid) frames after a sender has transmitted a single frame.
2 years ago
Browse all component changes

Glossary

English English
No related strings found in the glossary.

String information

Flags
read-only
Source string location
../../principles/reliability.rst:432
String age
2 years ago
Source string age
2 years ago
Translation file
locale/pot/principles/reliability.pot, string 109